The Films of Woody Allen: Match Point
Woody Allen's latest film has been enjoying a tidal wave of critical and popular praise which I believe is more a product of hype than due to the film's actual quality. My dissapointment in the movie, is also probably due more to the hype surrounding it than the movie itself.
The themes in this movie are obviously presented to be a struggle between luck and fairness. Not so obvious is the existential dillemma this entails to the main protagonist which explains his character. Chris Wilton, played by Jonathan Rhys Meyers (Velvet Goldmine) is an ex-tennis pro who decides to leave the court in search of a better lifesyle, I forget whether it's hinted that he quits tennis due to him simply being lucky at the game and not good.
There are two different types of characters in this movie. The lucky ones, represented by Chris Wilton and his counterpart Nola Rice played by Scarlett Johansson, those who always happen to be in the right place on the right time with the right looks and get everything they don't deserve. On the other side are the fair agreeable individuals that have worked hard to get where they are and do everything right in life. This is the family that Chris Wilton and Nola Rice luck themselves into.
In one of the finer scenes of the movie Chris Wilton details his life philosophy, his belief that the universe is governed by complete randomness, a depressing sentiment which is contrasted by his girlfriend and his best friend which happens to be his girlfriend's brother but not however by Nola, his best friend's fiance, who shares in his philosophy. It is in this scene that we realize that both characters are outsiders and will never truly belong with the family that has taken them in.
This is also the main reason for them getting together which is an obvious eventuality in the movie as well as one of the low points during it. The relationship between Chris and Nola takes so much screentime and story development in the movie but still remains very cliched and uninteresting which also serves as a model for the rest of the movie. It's at this point where the film turns into an ordinary suspense drama of a forbidden romance which would be perfectly okay if the individual scenes were any bit engaging or surprising on their own. Instead they become by the book and are no different from the scenes of films made by lesser directors. Ultimately the audience (me) is left bored for a good portion of the movie.
There are numerous other flaws in the movie, where in some parts the dialogue is laughably silly (such as the initial encounter between Nola and Chris) and at other times the screenplay seems simply badly written. For example, there is a character in the movie, an ex tennis friend of Chris, that appears twice in the movie with the sole purpose of giving Chris the opportunity to explain his plight in the film and nothing else, allowing for simple exposition and no advancement of story. This is simply lazy writing and it's hard to forgive.
The film picks up, however, in the last twenty minutes where the main character, after being his comfortable lifestyle threatened by Nola, makes his choice. I found that the actual choice, while surprising to some, was predictable seeing that it's a story that has been told many times before. Surprisingly, Woody Allen shows himself to be completely competent in developing suspense. The tension in the movie is geniusely dealt with through it's final minutes where there is one final but good surprise which gives our protagonist an ending fitting to his outlook on the world which sadly cements him within his existential depression forever.
It's been said by critics that this film differs with other Woody Allen movies by not featuring the Woody Allen archetype (which I've discussed in my previous article on the director). To me, anyone that says that loses any credibility they have as a movie critic. Chris Wilton is a man that finds himself in a position of sucess which he feels he doesn't deserve. Morally, he's weak especially when it comes to matters of lust, jeopardizing every good thing he has for sex. He lies when confronted with the truth and desperatley tries to save himself when his fuck ups become too extreme. This is Woody Allen, I know it and he knows it and is also the main reason that this movie is still a Woody Allen movie, overrated but still, being an Allen movie, worth seeing.
The themes in this movie are obviously presented to be a struggle between luck and fairness. Not so obvious is the existential dillemma this entails to the main protagonist which explains his character. Chris Wilton, played by Jonathan Rhys Meyers (Velvet Goldmine) is an ex-tennis pro who decides to leave the court in search of a better lifesyle, I forget whether it's hinted that he quits tennis due to him simply being lucky at the game and not good.
There are two different types of characters in this movie. The lucky ones, represented by Chris Wilton and his counterpart Nola Rice played by Scarlett Johansson, those who always happen to be in the right place on the right time with the right looks and get everything they don't deserve. On the other side are the fair agreeable individuals that have worked hard to get where they are and do everything right in life. This is the family that Chris Wilton and Nola Rice luck themselves into.
In one of the finer scenes of the movie Chris Wilton details his life philosophy, his belief that the universe is governed by complete randomness, a depressing sentiment which is contrasted by his girlfriend and his best friend which happens to be his girlfriend's brother but not however by Nola, his best friend's fiance, who shares in his philosophy. It is in this scene that we realize that both characters are outsiders and will never truly belong with the family that has taken them in.
This is also the main reason for them getting together which is an obvious eventuality in the movie as well as one of the low points during it. The relationship between Chris and Nola takes so much screentime and story development in the movie but still remains very cliched and uninteresting which also serves as a model for the rest of the movie. It's at this point where the film turns into an ordinary suspense drama of a forbidden romance which would be perfectly okay if the individual scenes were any bit engaging or surprising on their own. Instead they become by the book and are no different from the scenes of films made by lesser directors. Ultimately the audience (me) is left bored for a good portion of the movie.
There are numerous other flaws in the movie, where in some parts the dialogue is laughably silly (such as the initial encounter between Nola and Chris) and at other times the screenplay seems simply badly written. For example, there is a character in the movie, an ex tennis friend of Chris, that appears twice in the movie with the sole purpose of giving Chris the opportunity to explain his plight in the film and nothing else, allowing for simple exposition and no advancement of story. This is simply lazy writing and it's hard to forgive.
The film picks up, however, in the last twenty minutes where the main character, after being his comfortable lifestyle threatened by Nola, makes his choice. I found that the actual choice, while surprising to some, was predictable seeing that it's a story that has been told many times before. Surprisingly, Woody Allen shows himself to be completely competent in developing suspense. The tension in the movie is geniusely dealt with through it's final minutes where there is one final but good surprise which gives our protagonist an ending fitting to his outlook on the world which sadly cements him within his existential depression forever.
It's been said by critics that this film differs with other Woody Allen movies by not featuring the Woody Allen archetype (which I've discussed in my previous article on the director). To me, anyone that says that loses any credibility they have as a movie critic. Chris Wilton is a man that finds himself in a position of sucess which he feels he doesn't deserve. Morally, he's weak especially when it comes to matters of lust, jeopardizing every good thing he has for sex. He lies when confronted with the truth and desperatley tries to save himself when his fuck ups become too extreme. This is Woody Allen, I know it and he knows it and is also the main reason that this movie is still a Woody Allen movie, overrated but still, being an Allen movie, worth seeing.











